The sculpting of donors and famous people as recognizable images is not easy or inexpensive. It is so subjective that you may love the result and yet the family does not. Or vice versa.
Maynard H. Jackson, Jr. was mayor of Atlanta from 1974 though 1982 and then was elected to a 3rd term, 1990-1994. He was well liked then and history has so far maintained his reputation. So much so, that the International Terminal at Atlanta’s Hartsfield Airport was named for him in 2012.
In honor of that occasion, this sculpting was done by Fred Ajanogha.
Now, to me, the likeness is NOT very good, but the family was satisfied: “The artist did such a good job. His representation just seemed right at home, right down to the eyes. It was a great likeness, that seemed almost spooky at times.”
This is why sculpting of individuals is so tough to take on in honor of donors, or of donors’ family members. It’s a subjective thing. The person and their loved ones have to be happy with it. Yet, to me in this instance regarding Maynard’s image, only the hand on the chin is accurate.
Be careful if you devidence on a sculpting project. Use a realistic, tried and true sculptor. And avoid the “Emperor’s New Clothes syndrome”…..Meaning that just because everyone expects you to like it, doesn’t mean YOU have to like it. Be careful and be sure to see the clay modeling all along the way while there is still time to make changes.
You have not lived and learned until you have had the Mother of a deceased portraiture subject cry upon seeing the clay image, which I experienced early in my career with a university client of mine. The Mother hated the first clay model review that much. After (4) rounds of revisions, the situation did not improve. I was removed from supervising the sculpting phase. The foundry’s sculpting artist was replaced by a watercolor artist whom the Mother had found “in her neighborhood”. That new artist had always wanted to sculpt and this was her chance, I was told. In the end, the final cast bronze piece arrived. The Mother HATED it and would not allow it to be used at all!
So be careful; interview artists well, and get lots of review moments for you, the subject, family members and/or the donor, all along the way. The process, done well, can be a long one and it is certainly the most expensive of choices to make in honoring folks with images. Commit to the best artist, the time-consuming process, and to the chance to steward the donor appropriately.
Written by Robin E. WilliamsFiled under Best Practices for Donor Recognition, Robin E. Williams, Stewardship | Tags: Naming Opportunities, Stewardship, Think Before You Thank | Comments Off on Sculpting realistically….in the eye of the beholder
Being thankful is a gigantic key to happiness. I’m old enough to have learned this over and over. Here’s a well-worded reminder I find helpful. Not sure of the source for this, but am certainly thankful for it.
Be thankful for what you have and you’ll end up having more.
If you concentrate on what you don’t have, you will never have enough.
Trade your expectations for appreciation and the world changes instantly.
Gratitude is the single most important ingredient to living a s successful and fulfilled life.
Lastly, I’ll remind us all, we have a gift of 86,400 seconds today. Have I/you used one to say thank you?
Thank you for taking a moment to read my musings today.
Written by Robin E. WilliamsFiled under Robin E. Williams, Think Before You Thank | Tags: Thank You, Think Before You Thank | Comments Off on Gratitude Platitude
Fundraisers toss around these two terms, Stewardship and Donor Relations, interchangeably.
I don’t think they are. “Stewardship” has always carried a fiduciary inference to me. A vital and legal responsibility without fail. On the other hand, “Donor Relations” has meant just what it implies, the relationship an organization establishes and supports with a donor. The latter term is more inclusive and actually includes stewardship activities.
I cannot convey the differences/relationship any more concisely than Lynn Wester, “Donor Relations Guru”, has. Here is a wonderful overview, based on science vs. art.
A terrific comparison, so visually well thought out. See what you think and take an honest look at your organization’s set-up. Things not clearly defined in your “shop”? Emulate what you see below and all will smoothly transition to meaningful and purposeful actions-taken.
Written by Robin E. WilliamsBest Practices for Donor Recognition, Robin E. Williams, Think Before You Thank | Tags: Donor Relations, Stewardship, Think Before You Thank, Trends in Fundraising | Comments Off on “Donor Relations” vs. “Stewardship”
I’ve come to understand that Capital Campaigns are about institutional transformation…..NOT about raising money. Improved donor stewardship is key.
Just as a non profit organization spends time and money in prep for a campaign by evaluating just what has to be done to assure such meaningful change, early on, leaders must reflect on how their decisions to thank donors can be transformed.
Are day-to-day decisions to thank donors:
Proactive or reactionary?
Motivational or as an afterthought?
Programmatically planned or “in the moment” product decision-making?
Brand supportive or non-specific?
Any campaign (and, thus, an organization’s future) is best served if its thinking about thanking were transformed fully in preparation for imminent organizational change.
Written by Robin E. Williams
Filed under Donor Communications, Philanthropy, Robin E. Williams, Stewardship | Tags: Best Practices for Donor Recognition, Capital Campaign, Fundraising, Philanthropy, Stewardship, Think Before You Thank | Comments Off on Capital Campaigns are NOT about Raising Money!
As a Donor Recognition Program Consultant, I am sometimes asked back to a client’s office to initiate services aimed at furthering their thinking about thanking, to enhance policy decision-making and/or to instill administrative efficiencies in their Stewardship efforts to thank donors.
This morning I received a newsletter from our business consultant, Dave Baker of “Recourses”, that articulated my own experiences and inner-evaluation when “returning to the scene…”
Here I paraphrase his remarks to fit my clientele and experiences. I am hopeful that a few leaders in non-for-profit organizations may benefit by the introspection as well:
When asked to embark on “repeat consulting for a client, … I was surprised at how little things had changed since I worked with them and wondered why….” I understand that “working with any advisor is a painful process, but it’s designed to be a good investment rather than a fair bit of pain for just a little bit of gain.” Here’s the insight shared by Dave Baker.
“She (the client) initiated the re-engagement, so I presumed that I wasn’t blamed for the lack of progress, but I can’t help the introspection. Did I misread her situation? Did I not work hard enough to suggest a solution that she could realistically implement? Was everything good except that I wasn’t present enough during the implementation period?
Each of those reasons has been true at one time or another in a consulting career that spans decades, but it’s rare and I nearly always catch it in time and make it right, where appropriate. This time, though, I decided to chart out the simple…but profound…reasons why change might not take root…”
I, too, wondered why clients keep trying different things and can never seem to get rid of those weights that keep them from soaring above the fray.
Here are 4 reasons Baker offers as to why firms are held-back. “Getting unstuck is going to require ‘action; action will be inspired by these qualities’ and lacking any single one of them can hold you back:
- Courage. This is the stuff that helps you” hold your place in the marketplace, “dismiss that talented jerk who doesn’t fit the culture, and muster the internal strength to dissolve the ‘corporate and individual partnerships‘ already broken. If you don’t have enough of it (courage), gather the right people around you….
- Insight. Having just lauded courage,…why reinvent the wheel if a peer “organization” has already figured something out, saving you from wasteful experimentation. If you implement the suggestions of ‘the other organization‘, indiscriminately, you’ll end up with an average firm. But you can get valuable insight from many places. There aren’t many good books on my subject, but as their consultant, I’m here to ‘to suggest and evaluate new insights‘. Believe me, I want to say. “Another great source of insight is hiring a couple of great employees who have worked at “successful non profits” before. Resist those who can’t envision ‘bigger challenges‘ or don’t want to get their hands dirty with real work or don’t value your culture….
- Discipline. Give me a choice between the brilliant ‘leader’ who flits from one shiny object to the next or the dedicated “leader” who keeps doing smart things and I’ll always take the latter. Discipline covers a multitude of sins and it means that things get done. So they actually do a little bit of research, they write a short e-book, and they sit down and actually manage people. These are the folks who inspire me. I’ve seen many ‘organizations‘ who have all of the ingredients of success except
- Killer Instinct. When I initiated a massive research project studying 13,000+ people in the marketing field,… only one pattern surfaced around “a leader’s” personality profile and that was their killer instinct, which is my summary for their ability to make decisions, value control, take risks, and win. It’s what helps ‘leaders’ turn a mess of circumstances into a thriving ‘non profit‘”.
Filed under About Us, Donor Recognition Programs, Robin E. Williams, Think Before You Thank | Tags: Best Practices for Donor Recognition, Stewardship, Think Before You Thank | Comments Off on Believe in your Consultants